I'm Board certified.
So is Carmen A. Puliafito, MD
So is Farid Fata, MD
So are plenty of other Medscape "Best and Worst" physicians from 2012-2016.
So what is "Board certification?"
Truth be known, it is little more than a marketing accolade
And for a while, it worked. Doctors took board certification examinations to market themselves as competent in their field. They would take a written or oral examination created by their peers to demonstrate to others they knew their stuff. And while it remained a lifetime designation, it had some legitimacy. In reality, however, it was up to the residency training programs
to train the physicians and verify they knew their stuff. Hospitals used to verify credentials by calling residency programs and verifying doctors participated. They had large credentialing departments that kept everything on file.
But competition between hospitals vying for patients soon grew fierce and hospital marketing departments jumped on the credentialing bandwagon. Soon billboards would appear: "Come to see our board-certified specialists!" and the race was on.
Lawyers joined the fray, too. "My expert witness is better than your expert witness - see how many board certificates he has?"
Truth is, we love this crap. Just look at how many nurse practitioners
are "board certified" now!
In the 1960's to 1970's, the American Board of Internal Medicine recognized how lucrative this craze could be, but they had one big problem if they were going to make certifying doctors a full-time business: the number of doctors out there was finite. (It was about that time the board members started paying themselves). They also saw how much money the American Board of Family Medicine, founded in 1969, was generating using 7-year time-limited certifications.
But the ABIM knew internists would be on to them changing the rules for board certification from a lifetime to time-limited credential. So they first tried making a voluntary "super accolade" for internists, called the "Advanced Achievement in Internal Medicine." Needless to say, after four attempts that garnered progressively declining enrollment, the AAIM concept flopped. It was Lynn O. Langdon, MA (a non-physician and Chief Operating Officer of the ABIM) who declared
the "End to Voluntary Recertification" and time-limited certification was born with the threat of "uncertain circumstances"
if doctors did not participate.
Needless to say, with the help of conflicted members of the ACP who stood to make handsome returns from the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program (MKSAP), they were off to the financial races. And what a race it has proven to be: a nearly $1 billion dollar-a-year enterprise
for the entire ACGME.
Unfortunately, no one has ever stopped to study what happens to skilled, competent, board-certified doctors that fail their computerized "re-certification" examination or fail to garner enough "MOC points" to sit for their examination. No one asks about the damage this time-limited credential is having on our physician numbers and access to care. The money is too important to the system.
Not long ago, the chairman of our cardiology division had to relinquish his role as a teacher to medical students because he refused to re-certify in cardiology while also being "certified" in interventional cardiology. (He could keep performing catheterizations and stent placements and remain credentialed thanks to the change in double jeopardy rules
that changed just in the nick of time). How many medical students lost out on his experience as a result? Are we happier that medical students are now being taught by younger (time-limited) Board-certified physician instructors rather than life-time certified physicians with decades of experience in the field?
Doctors and nurses know the truth. That's why when seeking out a "quality" physician for their own care, they NEVER ask if a colleague is board-certified since board certification is now a false idol - a hoop to complete whether they're competent, ethical, or not.
We know that it's now far better to ask a trusted colleague or health professional when seeking care because there's much more to being a "quality" physician than holding a computer-generated "certificate."
Reference: Fisher WG, Schloss EJ. Medical specialty certification in the United States - a false idol?
J Card Electrophys October 2016; 47(1): 37-43.