tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18943510.post114731834404024545..comments2023-08-21T02:57:37.362-05:00Comments on Dr. Wes: Man-bashing: science with an agendaDrWeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17438019699222125477noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18943510.post-1147524300497829092006-05-13T07:45:00.000-05:002006-05-13T07:45:00.000-05:00I'm surprised they could find enough men for their...I'm surprised they could find enough men for their 'study' that wouldn't wet themselves at the sight of an icky gun.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18943510.post-1147511823455939872006-05-13T04:17:00.000-05:002006-05-13T04:17:00.000-05:00"Why weren't women included...?" Ha! Ask a hard ...<I>"Why weren't women included...?"</I> Ha! Ask a hard question sometime, Dr. Wes.<BR/><BR/>Women weren't included in this study for several reasons, including (a) the Women Are Angels fallacy, a primitive belief that women are too pure to be affected by such things as icky guns; and (b) the If Men Are A, Then Women Are Not-A fallacy, a belief often exhibited by true believers of the "women Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18943510.post-1147452234882836582006-05-12T11:43:00.000-05:002006-05-12T11:43:00.000-05:00Hey now, you're thinking too small here. If an inf...Hey now, you're thinking too small here. If an infinitesimal surge in testosterone is evidence that we should ban guns (which is pretty clearly the subtext here), what about all those not-so-infinitesimal hormonal changes during, say, a woman's period? Does SCIENCE PROVE! that females are inherently unstable?<BR/><BR/>It'd be nice if politicized studies like this one had to pass the smell test Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com